AMD Radeon R9 M265X
VS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
VS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R9 M265X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

674
Place in performance rating
2190
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.18
GCN
Architecture
TeraScale
Venus
Code name
RV620
Laptop
Type
Workstation
7 January 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
1 January 2009
no data
Price now
$148
Venus Pro
GPU code name
no data
Laptop
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R9 M265X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

640
Pipelines
40
625 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
625 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,500 million
Transistor count
181 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
32 Watt
25.00
Texture fill rate
1.600
800.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
96 gflops
10
Compute units
no data
640
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
625 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,500 million
Number of transistors
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R9 M265X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
170 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
medium sized
Laptop size
no data
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R9 M265X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1125 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
72 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R9 M265X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x VHDCI
1
Eyefinity
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R9 M265X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View is the additional functionality.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
+
PowerTune
no data
-
TrueAudio
no data
+
ZeroCore
no data
-
Enduro
no data
1
DualGraphics
no data
1
Switchable graphics
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R9 M265X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 11
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
5.1
Shader Model
no data
Not Listed
OpenCL
no data
+
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 M265X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 M265X or ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M265X
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M265X
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M265X
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M265X
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 M265X
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M265X

4.21% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (640 vs 40)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

More memory bandwidth (72 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)

Advantages of ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 4 GB)

So, AMD Radeon R9 M265X or ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 M265X .

AMD Radeon R9 M265X versus ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 M265X
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View