AMD Cayman
VS
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
AMD Cayman
VS
AMD Radeon R9 M265X

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 M265X. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
674
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN
Cayman
Code name
Venus
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
7 January 2014 (7 years ago)
$17.44
Price now
no data
Cayman
GPU code name
Venus Pro
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 M265X based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1536
Pipelines
640
no data
Core clock speed
625 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
625 MHz
2,640 million
Transistor count
1,500 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
25.00
no data
Floating-point performance
800.0 gflops
no data
Compute units
10
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
640
no data
Boost clock speed
625 MHz
2,640 million
Number of transistors
1,500 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 M265X.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 M265X can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1125 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 M265X, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Eyefinity
1

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 M265X is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 M265X. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 11
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cayman and AMD Radeon R9 M265X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cayman or AMD Radeon R9 M265X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cayman

More pipelines (1536 vs 640)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M265X

4.3% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cayman or AMD Radeon R9 M265X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 M265X .

AMD Cayman versus AMD Radeon R9 M265X performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cayman
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 M265X