General info
The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.
Technical specs
Choose the best graphics card between ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470.
Memory
Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 can be seen in this section.
Video outputs and ports
The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, the size and number of monitors.
Technologies
The difference between ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 is the additional functionality.
API support
The difference in supported APIs is ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. |
| May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. | |
| 30 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps) |
| 40 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps) |
| 60 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps) |
| May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game. | |
| ? | Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation. |
| Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible. | |
| The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. | |
Advantages of ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Less power consumption (32 Watt vs 215 Watt)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
14.74% faster in synthetic tests
Cheaper ($35 (0.1x MSRP) vs $148)
More pipelines (448 vs 40)
Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)
More maximum RAM amount (1280 MB vs 512 MB)
More memory bandwidth (133.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)
So, ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 .
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 performance benchmarks comparison
User rating
