ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
VS
AMD Radeon R7 260X
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
VS
AMD Radeon R7 260X

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and AMD Radeon R7 260X. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

2190
Place in performance rating
360
0.18
Value for money (0-100)
26.29
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
RV620
Code name
Bonaire
Workstation
Type
Desktop
1 January 2009
Release date
8 October 2013 (8 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$139
$148
Price now
$168 (1.2x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
no data
Value for money
5.21
no data
GPU code name
Bonaire
no data
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and AMD Radeon R7 260X based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

40
Pipelines
896
400 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
181 million
Transistor count
2,080 million
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
32 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
115 Watt
1.600
Texture fill rate
61.60
96 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,971 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
896
no data
Boost clock speed
1000 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
2,080 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
115 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and AMD Radeon R7 260X.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
170 mm
Length
170 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and AMD Radeon R7 260X can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
104 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and AMD Radeon R7 260X, the size and number of monitors.

1x VHDCI
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
-

Technologies

The difference between ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and AMD Radeon R7 260X is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
-
no data
PowerTune
-
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-

API support

The difference in supported APIs is ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and AMD Radeon R7 260X. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Shader Model
6.3
no data
OpenCL
2.0
no data
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and AMD Radeon R7 260X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View or AMD Radeon R7 260X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMD Radeon R7 260X
Death Stranding (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMD Radeon R7 260X
F1 2020 (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMD Radeon R7 260X
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMD Radeon R7 260X
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMD Radeon R7 260X
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Cheaper ($148 vs $168 (1.2x MSRP))

Less power consumption (32 Watt vs 115 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X

13.94% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (896 vs 40)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

More memory bandwidth (104 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)

So, ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View or AMD Radeon R7 260X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 260X .

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View versus AMD Radeon R7 260X performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 260X