ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 610
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 610

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Intel UHD Graphics 610. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

2190
Place in performance rating
706
0.18
Value for money (0-100)
no data
TeraScale
Architecture
Gen. 9 Kaby Lake
RV620
Code name
Comet Lake GT1
Workstation
Type
Laptop
1 January 2009
Release date
1 January 2019 (2 years ago)
$148
Price now
$601
no data
Value for money
1.28
no data
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT1
no data
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Intel UHD Graphics 610 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

40
Pipelines
96
400 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
181 million
Transistor count
189 million
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
32 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
1.600
Texture fill rate
12.60
96 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
12
no data
Boost clock speed
950 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
189 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Intel UHD Graphics 610.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
170 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Intel UHD Graphics 610 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Intel UHD Graphics 610, the size and number of monitors.

1x VHDCI
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Intel UHD Graphics 610. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View and Intel UHD Graphics 610 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View or Intel UHD Graphics 610 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Death Stranding (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Intel UHD Graphics 610
F1 2020 (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Intel UHD Graphics 610 15.5
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Cheaper ($148 vs $601)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 610

2.22% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (96 vs 40)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 32 Watt)

So, ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View or Intel UHD Graphics 610?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 610 .

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View versus Intel UHD Graphics 610 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 610