NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
VS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
VS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

926
Place in performance rating
2190
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.18
G9x
Architecture
TeraScale
G94
Code name
RV620
Laptop
Type
Workstation
15 July 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
1 January 2009
$230
Price now
$148
0.03
Value for money
no data
NB9E-GT
GPU code name
no data
Laptop
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

64
Pipelines
40
600 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
505 million
Transistor count
181 million
55 / 65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
32 Watt
19.20
Texture fill rate
1.600
192 gflops
Floating-point performance
96 gflops
64
CUDA cores
no data
240
Gigaflops
no data
64
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
505 million
Number of transistors
no data
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
170 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
51.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x VHDCI

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
+
HybridPower
no data
+
PureVideo HD
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS or ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS

1.58% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (64 vs 40)

More memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)

Advantages of ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Cheaper ($148 vs $230)

Less power consumption (32 Watt vs 75 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS or ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS .

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS versus ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View