Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
AMD FireStream 9250
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
AMD FireStream 9250

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

377
Place in performance rating
605
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Architecture
TeraScale
Tiger Lake Xe
Code name
RV770
Laptop
Type
Desktop
15 August 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
16 June 2008 (13 years ago)
Tiger Lake Xe
GPU code name
RV770
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

96
Pipelines
800
no data
Core clock speed
625 MHz
no data
Transistor count
956 million
10 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
25.00
no data
Floating-point performance
1,000.0 gflops
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
800
no data
Number of transistors
956 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250 can be seen in this section.

DDR4
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1986 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI

Technologies

The difference between Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250 is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 12_1
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
no data
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and AMD FireStream 9250 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or AMD FireStream 9250 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD FireStream 9250
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

18.84% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (10 nm vs 55 nm)

Advantages of AMD FireStream 9250

More pipelines (800 vs 96)

So, Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or AMD FireStream 9250?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 .

Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 versus AMD FireStream 9250 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FireStream 9250