General info
The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.
Technical specs
Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.
Memory
Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 can be seen in this section.
Technologies
The difference between AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the additional functionality.
API support
The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | ||||||
| Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | ||||||
| Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | ||||||
| Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | ||||||
| Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) | ||||||
| Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. |
| May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. | |
| 30 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps) |
| 40 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps) |
| 60 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps) |
| May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game. | |
| ? | Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation. |
| Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible. | |
| The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. | |
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
More pipelines (384 vs 96)
Advantages of Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
18.09% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (10 nm vs 28 nm)
So, AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 .
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) versus Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 performance benchmarks comparison
Overall benchmark performance
3DMark Ice Storm GPU | CpusData
User rating
