AMD Radeon R5 A240
VS
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon R5 A240
VS
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R5 A240 and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop). Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

820
Place in performance rating
498
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN
Jet
Code name
Kaveri Spectre
Desktop
Type
Desktop
2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
14 January 2014 (7 years ago)
Oland
GPU code name
Kaveri Spectre
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R5 A240 and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

320
Pipelines
384
1030 MHz
Core clock speed
720 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
690 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
50 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
15.60
Texture fill rate
no data
320
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
780 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
950 million
Number of transistors
no data
50 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R5 A240 and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
no data
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R5 A240 and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1800 MBps
Memory clock speed
no data
28.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R5 A240 and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop), the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
no data
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R5 A240 and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the additional functionality.

no data
DirectCompute 5.0
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R5 A240 and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop). Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_1)
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
4.6
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R5 A240 and AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R5 A240 or AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R5 A240
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R5 A240
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R5 A240
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R5 A240
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R5 A240
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 A240

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

3.47% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 320)

So, AMD Radeon R5 A240 or AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) .

AMD Radeon R5 A240 versus AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 A240
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)