NVIDIA Quadro M4000
VS
AMD FireStream 9250
NVIDIA Quadro M4000
VS
AMD FireStream 9250

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FireStream 9250. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

209
Place in performance rating
605
9.54
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GM204
Code name
RV770
Workstation
Type
Desktop
29 June 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
16 June 2008 (13 years ago)
$791
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$554 (0.7x MSRP)
Price now
no data
14.09
Value for money
no data
GM204
GPU code name
RV770
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FireStream 9250 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1664
Pipelines
800
773 MHz
Core clock speed
625 MHz
5,200 million
Transistor count
956 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
120 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
80.39
Texture fill rate
25.00
2,573 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,000.0 gflops
1664
Pipelines / CUDA cores
800
5,200 million
Number of transistors
956 million
120 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FireStream 9250.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
241 mm
Length
no data
1 x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
+
SLI options
no data
1" (2.5 cm)
Width
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FireStream 9250 can be seen in this section.

256 Bit
Memory type
GDDR3
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
6008 MHz
Memory clock speed
1986 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FireStream 9250, the size and number of monitors.

DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Display Connectors
1x DVI
4
Number of simultaneous displays
no data
Quadro Sync
Multi-display synchronization
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FireStream 9250 is the additional functionality.

5.2
CUDA
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
High-Performance Video I/O6
no data
+
nView Desktop Management
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FireStream 9250. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.5
OpenGL
3.3
+
Vulkan
no data
5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and AMD FireStream 9250 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro M4000 or AMD FireStream 9250 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M4000
AMD FireStream 9250
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M4000
AMD FireStream 9250
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M4000
AMD FireStream 9250
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M4000
AMD FireStream 9250
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M4000
AMD FireStream 9250
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000

24.78% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1664 vs 800)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (120 Watt vs 150 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of AMD FireStream 9250

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA Quadro M4000 or AMD FireStream 9250?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro M4000 .

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 versus AMD FireStream 9250 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro M4000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FireStream 9250