AMD FireStream 9250
VS
AMD FirePro W5000
AMD FireStream 9250
VS
AMD FirePro W5000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD FirePro W5000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

605
Place in performance rating
376
no data
Value for money (0-100)
9.44
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RV770
Code name
Pitcairn
Desktop
Type
Workstation
16 June 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
7 August 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$599
no data
Price now
$187 (0.3x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
5.50
RV770
GPU code name
Pitcairn
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD FirePro W5000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

800
Pipelines
768
625 MHz
Core clock speed
825 MHz
956 million
Transistor count
2,800 million
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
150 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
25.00
Texture fill rate
39.60
1,000.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
800
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
956 million
Number of transistors
2,800 million
150 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD FirePro W5000.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
183 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / half length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD FirePro W5000 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1986 MHz
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
63.55 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD FirePro W5000, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
2

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD FirePro W5000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD FirePro W5000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FireStream 9250 or AMD FirePro W5000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD FirePro W5000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD FirePro W5000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD FirePro W5000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD FirePro W5000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD FirePro W5000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD FireStream 9250

More pipelines (800 vs 768)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W5000

8.53% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 150 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 63.55 GB/s)

So, AMD FireStream 9250 or AMD FirePro W5000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W5000 .

AMD FireStream 9250 versus AMD FirePro W5000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FireStream 9250
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W5000