NVIDIA Tesla M2090
VS
AMD FirePro W5000
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
VS
AMD FirePro W5000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
376
no data
Value for money (0-100)
9.44
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GF110
Code name
Pitcairn
Workstation
Type
Workstation
25 July 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
7 August 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$599
$172
Price now
$187 (0.3x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
5.50
GF110
GPU code name
Pitcairn
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

512
Pipelines
768
651 MHz
Core clock speed
825 MHz
3,000 million
Transistor count
2,800 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
250 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
41.66
Texture fill rate
39.60
1,331.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
3,000 million
Number of transistors
2,800 million
250 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
248 mm
Length
183 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / half length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
3696 MHz
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
177.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
2

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD FirePro W5000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Tesla M2090 or AMD FirePro W5000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Tesla M2090
AMD FirePro W5000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla M2090

35.08% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($172 vs $187 (0.3x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (177.4 GB/s vs 102.4 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W5000

More pipelines (768 vs 512)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 250 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Tesla M2090 or AMD FirePro W5000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Tesla M2090 .

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 versus AMD FirePro W5000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Tesla M2090
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W5000