NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
VS
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
VS
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

855
Place in performance rating
504
0.66
Value for money (0-100)
13.64
G9x
Architecture
Polaris
G92
Code name
Lexa
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
14 August 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
21 March 2018 (3 years ago)
$925
Launch price (MSRP)
$149
$163 (0.2x MSRP)
Price now
$343 (2.3x MSRP)
0.13
Value for money
6.49
NB9E-GLM3
GPU code name
Polaris 12
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

128
Pipelines
512
550 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
754 million
Transistor count
2,200 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
35.20
Texture fill rate
39.01
352.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
128
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
no data
Boost clock speed
1219 MHz
754 million
Number of transistors
2,200 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100.

MXM-HE
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
51.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
no data
FreeSync
+
no data
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
+
+
PowerMizer 8.0
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M or AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Cheaper ($163 (0.2x MSRP) vs $343 (2.3x MSRP))

More memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 48 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

4.74% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (512 vs 128)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 65 nm)

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 75 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M or AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100