AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
VS
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
VS
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop). Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

504
Place in performance rating
487
13.64
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Polaris
Architecture
GCN
Lexa
Code name
Kaveri Spectre
Mobile workstation
Type
Desktop
21 March 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
14 January 2014 (7 years ago)
$149
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$343 (2.3x MSRP)
Price now
no data
6.49
Value for money
no data
Polaris 12
GPU code name
Kaveri Spectre
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

512
Pipelines
512
no data
Core clock speed
720 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
2,200 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
35 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
39.01
Texture fill rate
no data
1,248 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
1219 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
2,200 million
Number of transistors
no data
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
6000 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
48 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop), the size and number of monitors.

1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the additional functionality.

+
FreeSync
no data
+
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
no data
no data
DirectCompute 5.0
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop). Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
4.6
OpenGL
no data
1.2.131
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.0
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 or AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

0.33% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 or AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 .

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 versus AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)