AMD Caicos
VS
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Caicos
VS
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
504
no data
Value for money (0-100)
13.64
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Polaris
Caicos
Code name
Lexa
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
21 March 2018 (3 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$149
$10.38
Price now
$343 (2.3x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
6.49
Caicos
GPU code name
Polaris 12
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

160
Pipelines
512
no data
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
2,200 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
39.01
no data
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
no data
Boost clock speed
1219 MHz
370 million
Number of transistors
2,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Technologies

The difference between AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the additional functionality.

no data
FreeSync
+
no data
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $343 (2.3x MSRP))

Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

8.23% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (512 vs 160)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Caicos or AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 .

AMD Caicos versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Caicos
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100