Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
GT218
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
GT218

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GT218. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 4.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
no data
no data
Price now
$27
Montevina
GPU code name
GT218
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GT218 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

533 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10
Pipelines / CUDA cores
16
no data
Number of transistors
260 million

Technologies

The difference between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GT218 is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
1.2

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GT218. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.1
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GT218 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or GT218 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

2% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of GT218

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

So, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or GT218?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD .

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD versus GT218 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score GT218