Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
AMD Radeon R5 230
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
AMD Radeon R5 230

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and AMD Radeon R5 230. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
1017
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.61
Gen. 4.5
Architecture
TeraScale 2
no data
Code name
Caicos
no data
Type
Desktop
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
3 April 2014 (7 years ago)
no data
Price now
$119
no data
Design
reference
no data
Value for money
0.13
Montevina
GPU code name
Caicos
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and AMD Radeon R5 230 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
160
533 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Transistor count
370 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
19 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
5.000
no data
Floating-point performance
200.0 gflops
10
Pipelines / CUDA cores
160
no data
Number of transistors
370 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
19 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and AMD Radeon R5 230.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
N/A
no data
Bus support
PCIe 1.0 x4

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and AMD Radeon R5 230 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory bandwidth
10.67 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and AMD Radeon R5 230, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
-

Technologies

The difference between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and AMD Radeon R5 230 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
HD3D
-
no data
PowerTune
-
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
DDMA audio
-
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
no data
​PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and AMD Radeon R5 230. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
DirectX
DirectX® 11
no data
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
5.0
no data
OpenCL
1.2
no data
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and AMD Radeon R5 230 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or AMD Radeon R5 230 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
AMD Radeon R5 230
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
AMD Radeon R5 230
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
AMD Radeon R5 230
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
AMD Radeon R5 230
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
AMD Radeon R5 230
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230

0.12% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

So, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or AMD Radeon R5 230?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R5 230 .

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD versus AMD Radeon R5 230 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 230