Intel HD Graphics 4000
VS
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Intel HD Graphics 4000
VS
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

880
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Gen. 4.5
Ivy Bridge GT2
Code name
no data
Laptop
Type
no data
23 March 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
$91
Price now
no data
0.13
Value for money
no data
Ivy Bridge
GPU code name
Montevina
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

128
Pipelines
no data
350 MHz
Core clock speed
533 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,200 million
Transistor count
no data
22 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
20.80
Texture fill rate
no data
33.6 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
16
Pipelines / CUDA cores
10
1350 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,200 million
Number of transistors
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD can be seen in this section.

System Shared
Memory type
no data
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

The difference between Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
4.0
OpenGL
no data
1.1.80
Vulkan
no data
5.0
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel HD Graphics 4000 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel HD Graphics 4000 or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Death Stranding (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
F1 2020 (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 4000

1.1% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (22 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel HD Graphics 4000 or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel HD Graphics 4000 .

Intel HD Graphics 4000 versus Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

2.5 Out of 2 CpusData Score Intel HD Graphics 4000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD