AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

268
Place in performance rating
660
no data
Value for money (0-100)
7.72
Vega
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Vega 12
Code name
GT200B
Mobile workstation
Type
Workstation
15 November 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
11 November 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,799
$511
Price now
$140 (0.1x MSRP)
16.37
Value for money
0.69
Vega Mobile
GPU code name
GT200B
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1024
Pipelines
192
no data
Core clock speed
602 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
1,400 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
76.16
Texture fill rate
38.53
no data
Floating-point performance
462.3 gflops
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
1190 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
no data
Number of transistors
1,400 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 can be seen in this section.

HBM2
Memory type
GDDR3
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
1024 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
2400 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
307.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

17.33% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1024 vs 192)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 150 Watt)

More memory bandwidth (307.2 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Cheaper ($140 (0.1x MSRP) vs $511)

More maximum RAM amount (1536 MB vs 4 GB)

So, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 .

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800