NVIDIA Quadro M2200
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro M2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

282
Place in performance rating
268
20.11
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Maxwell
Architecture
Vega
N17P-Q3
Code name
Vega 12
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
13 January 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
15 November 2018 (3 years ago)
$1967
Price now
$511
2.84
Value for money
16.37
N17P-Q3
GPU code name
Vega Mobile
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro M2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1024
Pipelines
1024
694 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1870 Million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
55 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
66.30
Texture fill rate
76.16
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1024
1038 MHz
Boost clock speed
1190 MHz
1870 Million
Number of transistors
no data
55 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
large
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro M2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
HBM2
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
5508 MHz
Memory clock speed
2400 MHz
88 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
307.2 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro M2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
1.2
Display Port
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro M2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the additional functionality.

5.2
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
3D Stereo
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Display Management
no data
+
nView
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro M2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.126
Vulkan
no data
5.0
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro M2200 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 or AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Less power consumption (55 Watt vs 75 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

1.33% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($511 vs $1967)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More memory bandwidth (307.2 GB/s vs 88 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro M2200 or AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 .

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro M2200
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16