AMD FireStream 9250
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250E
AMD FireStream 9250
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250E

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD Radeon R7 250E. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

605
Place in performance rating
not rated
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RV770
Code name
Cape Verde
Desktop
Type
Desktop
16 June 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
20 December 2013 (7 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$109
no data
Price now
$599 (5.5x MSRP)
RV770
GPU code name
Cape Verde
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD Radeon R7 250E based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

800
Pipelines
512
625 MHz
Core clock speed
800 MHz
956 million
Transistor count
1,500 million
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
150 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
25.00
Texture fill rate
25.60
1,000.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
819.2 gflops
800
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
956 million
Number of transistors
1,500 million
150 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
55 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD Radeon R7 250E.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD Radeon R7 250E can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1986 MHz
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
63.55 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD Radeon R7 250E, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD Radeon R7 250E. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FireStream 9250 and AMD Radeon R7 250E graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FireStream 9250 or AMD Radeon R7 250E good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD Radeon R7 250E
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD Radeon R7 250E
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD Radeon R7 250E
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD Radeon R7 250E
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FireStream 9250
AMD Radeon R7 250E
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD FireStream 9250

5.37% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (800 vs 512)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250E

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (55 Watt vs 150 Watt)

More memory bandwidth (72 GB/s vs 63.55 GB/s)

So, AMD FireStream 9250 or AMD Radeon R7 250E?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FireStream 9250 .

AMD FireStream 9250 versus AMD Radeon R7 250E performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FireStream 9250
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 250E