NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
VS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

219
Place in performance rating
not rated
Turing
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TU117
Code name
Vega 10
Mobile workstation
Type
Desktop
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
7 August 2017 (4 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$699
$2221
Price now
$246 (0.4x MSRP)
5.57
Value for money
no data
N19P-Q3
GPU code name
Vega 10
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1024
Pipelines
4096
1575 MHz
Core clock speed
1408 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1668 MHz
4,700 million
Transistor count
12,500 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
60 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
345 Watt
114.2
Texture fill rate
427.0
no data
Floating-point performance
14,336 gflops
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
1785 MHz
Boost clock speed
1668 MHz
4,700 million
Number of transistors
12,500 million
60 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
345 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
282 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
HBM2
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
2048 Bit
8000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1890 MHz
128.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

30.06% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 14 nm)

Less power consumption (60 Watt vs 345 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Cheaper ($246 (0.4x MSRP) vs $2221)

More pipelines (4096 vs 1024)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (483.8 GB/s vs 128.0 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile .

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling