Intel UHD Graphics 617
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Intel UHD Graphics 617
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

557
Place in performance rating
219
Gen. 9 Amber Lake
Architecture
Turing
Amber Lake GT2
Code name
TU117
Laptop
Type
Mobile workstation
30 October 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
$950
Price now
$2221
1.42
Value for money
5.57
Kaby-Lake GT2
GPU code name
N19P-Q3
Laptop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
1024
300 MHz
Core clock speed
1575 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
no data
Transistor count
4,700 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
25.20
Texture fill rate
114.2
24
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1024
1150 MHz
Boost clock speed
1785 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
4,700 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
60 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile can be seen in this section.

DDR3L/LPDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
+
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.103
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel UHD Graphics 617 or NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 617
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Death Stranding (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 617
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
F1 2020 (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 617
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 617
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 617
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 617

Cheaper ($950 vs $2221)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 60 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

24.5% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1024 vs 192)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 14 nm)

So, Intel UHD Graphics 617 or NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile .

Intel UHD Graphics 617 versus NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 617
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile