NVIDIA NVS 810
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
NVIDIA NVS 810
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

614
Place in performance rating
1047
1.41
Value for money (0-100)
1.41
Maxwell
Architecture
G8x
GM107
Code name
G84
Workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
4 November 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
1 June 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$149.90
$2098
Price now
$212 (1.4x MSRP)
0.32
Value for money
no data
GM107
GPU code name
NB8P-GLM
Workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

512
Pipelines
32
902 MHz
Core clock speed
625 MHz
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,870 million
Transistor count
289 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
68 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
33.06
Texture fill rate
10.00
2x 1,058 gflops
Floating-point performance
80 gflops
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
32
1033 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,870 million
Number of transistors
289 million
68 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
50 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
MXM-HE
198 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M, the size and number of monitors.

8x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA NVS 810 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 810

3.84% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (512 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 80 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Cheaper ($212 (1.4x MSRP) vs $2098)

Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 68 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (25.6 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA NVS 810 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA NVS 810 .

NVIDIA NVS 810 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA NVS 810
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M