NVIDIA NVS 810
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
NVIDIA NVS 810
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

614
Place in performance rating
not rated
1.41
Value for money (0-100)
0.47
Maxwell
Architecture
Rankine
GM107
Code name
NV35
Workstation
Type
Workstation
4 November 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
22 July 2003 (18 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$203
$2098
Price now
$443 (2.2x MSRP)
0.32
Value for money
no data
GM107
GPU code name
NV35
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

512
Pipelines
no data
902 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,870 million
Transistor count
135 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
130 nm
68 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
33.06
Texture fill rate
3.200
2x 1,058 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1033 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,870 million
Number of transistors
135 million
68 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
AGP 8x
198 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x Molex

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
DDR
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
850 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
27.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000, the size and number of monitors.

8x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0a
4.6
OpenGL
1.5 (2.1)

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA NVS 810 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA NVS 810
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 810

4.38% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 130 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000

Cheaper ($443 (2.2x MSRP) vs $2098)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (27.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA NVS 810 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA NVS 810 .

NVIDIA NVS 810 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA NVS 810
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000