NVIDIA GRID K240Q
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

414
Place in performance rating
896
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
GK104
Code name
GF117
Workstation
Type
Laptop
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2012 (9 years ago)
$469
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
no data
Price now
$310
no data
Value for money
0.04
GK104
GPU code name
N13M-GS
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1536
Pipelines
96
745 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
3,540 million
Transistor count
585 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
225 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
95.36
Texture fill rate
no data
2,289 gflops
Floating-point performance
240.0 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
96
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
96
3,540 million
Number of transistors
585 million
225 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
5000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
160.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
no data
Verde Drivers
+
no data
3D Blu-Ray
+
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
no data
DirectCompute
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 API
4.6
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GRID K240Q or NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID K240Q
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID K240Q
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID K240Q
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID K240Q
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID K240Q
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID K240Q

7.91% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1536 vs 96)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 225 Watt)

So, NVIDIA GRID K240Q or NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GRID K240Q .

NVIDIA GRID K240Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GRID K240Q
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M