AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
VS
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
VS
NVIDIA GRID K240Q

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA GRID K240Q. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

96
Place in performance rating
414
Vega
Architecture
Kepler
Vega 10
Code name
GK104
Workstation
Type
Workstation
14 December 2017 (3 years ago)
Release date
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
$399
Launch price (MSRP)
$469
$4999 (12.5x MSRP)
Price now
no data
3.69
Value for money
no data
Vega
GPU code name
GK104
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA GRID K240Q based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

3584
Pipelines
1536
1247 MHz
Core clock speed
745 MHz
1250 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
12,500 million
Transistor count
3,540 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
210 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
280.0
Texture fill rate
95.36
9,677 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
3584
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1536
1250 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
12,500 million
Number of transistors
3,540 million
210 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
225 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA GRID K240Q.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA GRID K240Q can be seen in this section.

HBM2
Memory type
GDDR5
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2048 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
786 MHz
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
402.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA GRID K240Q, the size and number of monitors.

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
HDMI
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA GRID K240Q. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA GRID K240Q graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 or NVIDIA GRID K240Q good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

46.73% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (3584 vs 1536)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (210 Watt vs 225 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (402.4 GB/s vs 160.0 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID K240Q

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 or NVIDIA GRID K240Q?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 .

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 versus NVIDIA GRID K240Q performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GRID K240Q