NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

474
Place in performance rating
96
Kepler
Architecture
Vega
GK106
Code name
Vega 10
Laptop
Type
Workstation
30 May 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
14 December 2017 (3 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$399
$93
Price now
$4999 (12.5x MSRP)
0.53
Value for money
3.69
N14-GE
GPU code name
Vega
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

768
Pipelines
3584
850 MHz
Core clock speed
1247 MHz
863 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
2,540 million
Transistor count
12,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
210 Watt
55.23
Texture fill rate
280.0
1,326 gflops
Floating-point performance
9,677 gflops
768
CUDA cores
no data
768
Pipelines / CUDA cores
3584
863 MHz
Boost clock speed
1250 MHz
2,540 million
Number of transistors
12,500 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
210 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56.

MXM-B (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
no data
+
SLI options
no data
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
HBM2
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
2048 Bit
2000 MHz
Memory clock speed
786 MHz
64.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
402.4 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-
GDDR5
Standard memory configuration
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
+
HDMI
+
Up to 2048x1536
VGA аnalog display support
no data
Up to 3840x2160
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
no data
Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support
no data
Up to 1920x1200
LVDS signal support
no data
+
HDCP content protection
no data
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
no data
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the additional functionality.

+
3D Vision
no data
+
GPU Boost
no data
+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
no data
+
FXAA
no data
+
TXAA
no data
+
Verde Drivers
no data
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
no data
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
no data
+
Direct Compute
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 API
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.126
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M or AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Cheaper ($93 vs $4999 (12.5x MSRP))

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 210 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

47.85% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (3584 vs 768)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (402.4 GB/s vs 64.0 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M or AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56