NVIDIA GeForce MX250
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

420
Place in performance rating
474
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
GP108B
Code name
GK106
Laptop
Type
Laptop
20 February 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
30 May 2013 (8 years ago)
$1165
Price now
$93
2.35
Value for money
0.53
N17S-G2
GPU code name
N14-GE
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
768
1518 MHz
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1,800 million
Transistor count
2,540 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
24.91
Texture fill rate
55.23
no data
Floating-point performance
1,326 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
768
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
1582 MHz
Boost clock speed
863 MHz
1,800 million
Number of transistors
2,540 million
10 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M.

PCIe 3.0 x4
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
large
Laptop size
large
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
7000 MHz
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
48.06 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-
no data
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
HDMI
+
no data
VGA аnalog display support
Up to 2048x1536
no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
no data
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
no data
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
no data
HDCP content protection
+
no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M is the additional functionality.

+
Multi Monitor
no data
no data
3D Vision
+
+
GPU Boost
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
no data
FXAA
+
no data
TXAA
+
no data
Verde Drivers
+
no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
no data
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
no data
Direct Compute
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 API
4.6
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
1.1.126
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX250

3.15% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (10 Watt vs 75 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

Multi Monitor

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Cheaper ($93 vs $1165)

More pipelines (768 vs 384)

More memory bandwidth (64.0 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce MX250 .

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce MX250
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M