NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
VS
AMD FirePro S9000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
VS
AMD FirePro S9000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and AMD FirePro S9000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

896
Place in performance rating
251
no data
Value for money (0-100)
35.93
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GF117
Code name
Tahiti
Laptop
Type
Workstation
1 October 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
24 August 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$2,499
$310
Price now
$139 (0.1x MSRP)
0.04
Value for money
21.40
N13M-GS
GPU code name
Tahiti
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and AMD FirePro S9000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

96
Pipelines
1792
no data
Core clock speed
900 MHz
585 million
Transistor count
4,313 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
100.8
240.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
96
CUDA cores
no data
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
585 million
Number of transistors
4,313 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and AMD FirePro S9000.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
medium sized
Laptop size
no data
PCI Express 2.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and AMD FirePro S9000 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and AMD FirePro S9000, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
+
HDCP
no data
Up to 2048x1536
Maximum VGA resolution
no data
+
HDMI
no data
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
1

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and AMD FirePro S9000 is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
Verde Drivers
no data
+
3D Blu-Ray
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
no data
+
DirectCompute
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and AMD FirePro S9000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 API
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and AMD FirePro S9000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M or AMD FirePro S9000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
AMD FirePro S9000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
AMD FirePro S9000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
AMD FirePro S9000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
AMD FirePro S9000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
AMD FirePro S9000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 350 Watt)

Advantages of AMD FirePro S9000

21.42% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($139 (0.1x MSRP) vs $310)

More pipelines (1792 vs 96)

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 1 GB)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M or AMD FirePro S9000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro S9000 .

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M versus AMD FirePro S9000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro S9000