AMD Radeon R9 280X
VS
AMD FirePro S9000
AMD Radeon R9 280X
VS
AMD FirePro S9000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD FirePro S9000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

231
Place in performance rating
251
10.96
Value for money (0-100)
35.93
GCN
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Tahiti
Code name
Tahiti
Desktop
Type
Workstation
8 October 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
24 August 2012 (9 years ago)
$299
Launch price (MSRP)
$2,499
$330 (1.1x MSRP)
Price now
$139 (0.1x MSRP)
reference
Design
no data
9.36
Value for money
21.40
Thaiti XTL
GPU code name
Tahiti
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD FirePro S9000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

2048
Pipelines
1792
no data
Core clock speed
900 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
4,313 million
Transistor count
4,313 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
250 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
128.0
Texture fill rate
100.8
4,096 gflops
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
2048
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
1000 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,313 million
Number of transistors
4,313 million
250 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD FirePro S9000.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
275 mm
Length
267 mm
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD FirePro S9000 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
3 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
288 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD FirePro S9000, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
+
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data
+
DisplayPort support
no data
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
1

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD FirePro S9000 is the additional functionality.

+
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
1
LiquidVR
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
1
TressFX
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data
+
UVD
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD FirePro S9000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD FirePro S9000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 280X or AMD FirePro S9000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280X
AMD FirePro S9000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280X
AMD FirePro S9000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280X
AMD FirePro S9000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280X
AMD FirePro S9000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280X
AMD FirePro S9000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X

3.6% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2048 vs 1792)

Less power consumption (250 Watt vs 350 Watt)

More memory bandwidth (288 GB/s vs 264 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro S9000

Cheaper ($139 (0.1x MSRP) vs $330 (1.1x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 3 GB)

So, AMD Radeon R9 280X or AMD FirePro S9000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 280X .

AMD Radeon R9 280X versus AMD FirePro S9000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 280X
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro S9000