NVIDIA GRID K160Q
VS
AMD FirePro W2100
NVIDIA GRID K160Q
VS
AMD FirePro W2100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GRID K160Q and AMD FirePro W2100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

793
Place in performance rating
682
no data
Value for money (0-100)
10.86
Kepler
Architecture
GCN
GK107
Code name
Oland
Workstation
Type
Desktop
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
2 October 2015 (6 years ago)
$125
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
no data
Price now
$99
no data
Value for money
4.19
GK107
GPU code name
Mars
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GRID K160Q and AMD FirePro W2100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
320
850 MHz
Core clock speed
680 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1,270 million
Transistor count
950 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
130 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
26 Watt
13.60
Texture fill rate
13.60
326.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
435.2 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Boost clock speed
680 MHz
1,270 million
Number of transistors
950 million
130 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
400 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GRID K160Q and AMD FirePro W2100.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
low profile / half length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GRID K160Q and AMD FirePro W2100 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
n/a
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1782 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
28.51 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GRID K160Q and AMD FirePro W2100, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
2

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GRID K160Q and AMD FirePro W2100 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GRID K160Q and AMD FirePro W2100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GRID K160Q and AMD FirePro W2100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GRID K160Q or AMD FirePro W2100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID K160Q
AMD FirePro W2100
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID K160Q
AMD FirePro W2100
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID K160Q
AMD FirePro W2100
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID K160Q
AMD FirePro W2100
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID K160Q
AMD FirePro W2100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID K160Q

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of AMD FirePro W2100

0.76% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (320 vs 192)

Less power consumption (26 Watt vs 130 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (28.8 GB/s vs 28.51 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GRID K160Q or AMD FirePro W2100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W2100 .

NVIDIA GRID K160Q versus AMD FirePro W2100 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GRID K160Q
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W2100