NVIDIA Quadro CX
VS
AMD FirePro W2100
NVIDIA Quadro CX
VS
AMD FirePro W2100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro CX and AMD FirePro W2100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

668
Place in performance rating
682
7.22
Value for money (0-100)
10.86
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN
GT200B
Code name
Oland
Workstation
Type
Desktop
11 November 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
2 October 2015 (6 years ago)
$1,999
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$199 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
$99
0.46
Value for money
4.19
GT200B
GPU code name
Mars
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro CX and AMD FirePro W2100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
320
602 MHz
Core clock speed
680 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1,400 million
Transistor count
950 million
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
150 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
26 Watt
38.53
Texture fill rate
13.60
462.3 gflops
Floating-point performance
435.2 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Boost clock speed
680 MHz
1,400 million
Number of transistors
950 million
150 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
400 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro CX and AMD FirePro W2100.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
267 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
low profile / half length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro CX and AMD FirePro W2100 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
n/a
1536 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1600 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
76.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro CX and AMD FirePro W2100, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
2x DisplayPort
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
2

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro CX and AMD FirePro W2100 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro CX and AMD FirePro W2100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro CX and AMD FirePro W2100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro CX or AMD FirePro W2100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro CX
AMD FirePro W2100
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro CX
AMD FirePro W2100
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro CX
AMD FirePro W2100
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro CX
AMD FirePro W2100
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro CX
AMD FirePro W2100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro CX

0.21% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (1536 MB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W2100

Cheaper ($99 vs $199 (0.1x MSRP))

More pipelines (320 vs 192)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (26 Watt vs 150 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro CX or AMD FirePro W2100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro CX .

NVIDIA Quadro CX versus AMD FirePro W2100 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro CX
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W2100