NVIDIA Quadro K620
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX
NVIDIA Quadro K620
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro CX. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

444
Place in performance rating
668
18.64
Value for money (0-100)
7.22
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GM107
Code name
GT200B
Workstation
Type
Workstation
22 July 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
11 November 2008 (13 years ago)
$189.89
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,999
$386 (2x MSRP)
Price now
$199 (0.1x MSRP)
2.42
Value for money
0.46
GM107
GPU code name
GT200B
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro CX based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
192
1058 MHz
Core clock speed
602 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,870 million
Transistor count
1,400 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
41 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
26.98
Texture fill rate
38.53
863.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
462.3 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
1124 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,870 million
Number of transistors
1,400 million
41 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro CX.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
160 mm
Length
267 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1" (2.5 cm)
Width
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro CX can be seen in this section.

128 Bit
Memory type
GDDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro CX, the size and number of monitors.

DVI-I DP
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
4
Number of simultaneous displays
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro CX is the additional functionality.

5.0
CUDA
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Desktop Management
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro CX. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.5
OpenGL
3.3
+
Vulkan
no data
5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro CX graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K620 or NVIDIA Quadro CX good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA Quadro CX
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K620

6.1% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 192)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (41 Watt vs 150 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro CX

Cheaper ($199 (0.1x MSRP) vs $386 (2x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (1536 MB vs 2 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K620 or NVIDIA Quadro CX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K620 .

NVIDIA Quadro K620 versus NVIDIA Quadro CX performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K620
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro CX