NVIDIA Quadro K620
VS
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
NVIDIA Quadro K620
VS
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

444
Place in performance rating
327
18.64
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GM107
Code name
GM204
Workstation
Type
Workstation
22 July 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
30 August 2015 (6 years ago)
$189.89
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$386 (2x MSRP)
Price now
no data
2.42
Value for money
no data
GM107
GPU code name
GM204
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
1536
1058 MHz
Core clock speed
722 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,870 million
Transistor count
5,200 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
41 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
26.98
Texture fill rate
69.31
863.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,218 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1536
1124 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,870 million
Number of transistors
5,200 million
41 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
160 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
1" (2.5 cm)
Width
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q can be seen in this section.

128 Bit
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
160.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q, the size and number of monitors.

DVI-I DP
Display Connectors
No outputs
4
Number of simultaneous displays
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q is the additional functionality.

5.0
CUDA
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Desktop Management
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data
5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K620 or NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K620

Less power consumption (41 Watt vs 100 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q

6.03% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1536 vs 384)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 2 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K620 or NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q .

NVIDIA Quadro K620 versus NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K620
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q