Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 620

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
639
Gen. 4
Architecture
Gen. 9.5
no data
Code name
Kaby Lake GT2
no data
Type
Laptop
9 May 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
1 September 2017 (4 years ago)
$77
Price now
$706
no data
Value for money
1.06
Crestline
GPU code name
Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
192
500 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
27.60
8
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
189 million
13.5 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
LPDDR3/DDR4
no data
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 10, Shader 3.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Intel UHD Graphics 620 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Death Stranding (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Intel UHD Graphics 620
F1 2020 (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Intel UHD Graphics 620 29.2 13.5 10.2
Gears Tactics (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Intel UHD Graphics 620 31.2 10.7
Doom Eternal (2020) Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Cheaper ($77 vs $706)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 620

5.77% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 90 nm)

So, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 or Intel UHD Graphics 620?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 620 .

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 versus Intel UHD Graphics 620 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 620