AMD Radeon Pro 460
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
AMD Radeon Pro 460
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P3200

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

339
Place in performance rating
158
Polaris
Architecture
Pascal
Baffin
Code name
N18E-Q1
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
8 August 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
27 February 2017 (4 years ago)
$100
Price now
$2122
36.89
Value for money
7.26
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
GPU code name
N18E-Q1
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1024
Pipelines
1792
900 MHz
Core clock speed
708 - 1202 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
1228 MHz
3,000 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
35 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
58.05
Texture fill rate
172.8
1,858 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
907 MHz
Boost clock speed
1228 MHz
3,000 million
Number of transistors
7,200 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6084 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
192 Bit
5000 MHz
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
81.28 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
168.3 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
6.1
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Vision Pro
+
no data
nView
+
+
FreeSync
no data
+
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2.131
Vulkan
1.2.131
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro 460 or NVIDIA Quadro P3200 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 460
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 460
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 460
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 460
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 460
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 460

Cheaper ($100 vs $2122)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 16 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P3200

18.46% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1792 vs 1024)

More maximum RAM amount (6084 MB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (168.3 GB/s vs 81.28 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon Pro 460 or NVIDIA Quadro P3200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P3200 .

AMD Radeon Pro 460 versus NVIDIA Quadro P3200 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon Pro 460
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro P3200