NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P3200

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
158
4.76
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
G84
Code name
N18E-Q1
Workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
12 September 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
27 February 2017 (4 years ago)
$699
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$190 (0.3x MSRP)
Price now
$2122
no data
Value for money
7.26
G84
GPU code name
N18E-Q1
Workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

32
Pipelines
1792
460 MHz
Core clock speed
708 - 1202 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1228 MHz
289 million
Transistor count
no data
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
42 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
7.360
Texture fill rate
172.8
58.88 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
no data
Boost clock speed
1228 MHz
289 million
Number of transistors
7,200 million
42 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 can be seen in this section.

DDR2
Memory type
GDDR5
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
6084 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
192 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
168.3 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
6.1
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Vision Pro
+
no data
nView
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 or NVIDIA Quadro P3200 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

Cheaper ($190 (0.3x MSRP) vs $2122)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P3200

33.91% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1792 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 80 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (6084 MB vs 512 MB)

More memory bandwidth (168.3 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 or NVIDIA Quadro P3200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P3200 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 versus NVIDIA Quadro P3200 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro P3200