AMD Radeon R9 270
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
AMD Radeon R9 270
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P3200

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R9 270 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

286
Place in performance rating
158
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
Curacao
Code name
N18E-Q1
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
13 November 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
27 February 2017 (4 years ago)
$179
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$269 (1.5x MSRP)
Price now
$2122
reference
Design
no data
6.20
Value for money
7.26
Curacao
GPU code name
N18E-Q1
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R9 270 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1280
Pipelines
1792
no data
Core clock speed
708 - 1202 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1228 MHz
2,800 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
150 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
74.00
Texture fill rate
172.8
2,368 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
1280
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
925 MHz
Boost clock speed
1228 MHz
2,800 million
Number of transistors
7,200 million
150 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R9 270 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
210 mm
Length
no data
1 x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R9 270 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6084 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
192 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
179.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
168.3 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R9 270 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
1
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data
+
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R9 270 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
6.1
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Vision Pro
+
no data
nView
+
-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
1
LiquidVR
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
1
TressFX
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data
+
UVD
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R9 270 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
1.2.131
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 270 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 270 or NVIDIA Quadro P3200 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270

Cheaper ($269 (1.5x MSRP) vs $2122)

More memory bandwidth (179.2 GB/s vs 168.3 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P3200

14.94% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1792 vs 1280)

Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (6084 MB vs 2 GB)

So, AMD Radeon R9 270 or NVIDIA Quadro P3200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P3200 .

AMD Radeon R9 270 versus NVIDIA Quadro P3200 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 270
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro P3200