Intel HD Graphics 3000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Intel HD Graphics 3000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

993
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.76
Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Tesla
Sandy Bridge GT2
Code name
G84
Laptop
Type
Workstation
1 February 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
12 September 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$699
$476
Price now
$190 (0.3x MSRP)
0.01
Value for money
no data
Sandy Bridge
GPU code name
G84
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

96
Pipelines
32
350 MHz
Core clock speed
460 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
995 million
Transistor count
289 million
32 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
42 Watt
13.80
Texture fill rate
7.360
20.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
58.88 gflops
12
Pipelines / CUDA cores
32
1350 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
995 million
Number of transistors
289 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
42 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 can be seen in this section.

System Shared
Memory type
DDR2
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.1
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel HD Graphics 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel HD Graphics 3000 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Death Stranding (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
F1 2020 (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 3000

0.64% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (96 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (32 nm vs 80 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

Cheaper ($190 (0.3x MSRP) vs $476)

So, Intel HD Graphics 3000 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel HD Graphics 3000 .

Intel HD Graphics 3000 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel HD Graphics 3000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700