NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro 400. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

379
Place in performance rating
1064
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.94
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GK104
Code name
GT216
Workstation
Type
Workstation
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
5 April 2011 (10 years ago)
$937
Launch price (MSRP)
$169
no data
Price now
$510 (3x MSRP)
GK104
GPU code name
GT216
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro 400 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1536
Pipelines
48
745 MHz
Core clock speed
450 MHz
3,540 million
Transistor count
486 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
225 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
32 Watt
95.36
Texture fill rate
7.200
2,289 gflops
Floating-point performance
108 gflops
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
3,540 million
Number of transistors
486 million
225 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
32 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro 400.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
163 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro 400 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
5000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1540 MHz
160.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
12.32 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro 400, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro 400. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro 400 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GRID K260Q or NVIDIA Quadro 400 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID K260Q

12.81% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1536 vs 48)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More memory bandwidth (160.0 GB/s vs 12.32 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 400

Less power consumption (32 Watt vs 225 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 2 GB)

So, NVIDIA GRID K260Q or NVIDIA Quadro 400?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GRID K260Q .

NVIDIA GRID K260Q versus NVIDIA Quadro 400 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GRID K260Q
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro 400