NVIDIA GeForce 825M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

731
Place in performance rating
520
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.51
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
GK208
Code name
GK107
Laptop
Type
Workstation
27 January 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
1 March 2013 (8 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$599
$160
Price now
$234 (0.4x MSRP)
0.37
Value for money
1.22
GK208
GPU code name
GK107
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
384
850 MHz
Core clock speed
954 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
915 million
Transistor count
1,270 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
33 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
30.11
Texture fill rate
30.53
722.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
941 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
915 million
Number of transistors
1,270 million
33 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
51 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
202 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.126
Vulkan
+
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 825M or NVIDIA Quadro K2000D good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 825M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 825M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 825M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 825M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 825M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Cheaper ($160 vs $234 (0.4x MSRP))

Less power consumption (33 Watt vs 51 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

4.07% faster in synthetic tests

More memory bandwidth (64 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 825M or NVIDIA Quadro K2000D?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2000D .

NVIDIA GeForce 825M versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000D performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce 825M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2000D