AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
520
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.51
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
Cypress
Code name
GK107
Desktop
Type
Workstation
no data
Release date
1 March 2013 (8 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$599
$12.72
Price now
$234 (0.4x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
1.22
Cypress
GPU code name
GK107
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1600
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
954 MHz
2,154 million
Transistor count
1,270 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
30.53
no data
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
1600
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
2,154 million
Number of transistors
1,270 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
51 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
202 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cypress or NVIDIA Quadro K2000D good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cypress

Cheaper ($12.72 vs $234 (0.4x MSRP))

More pipelines (1600 vs 384)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

7.6% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cypress or NVIDIA Quadro K2000D?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2000D .

AMD Cypress versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000D performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cypress
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2000D