NVIDIA Quadro P2000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 825M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

194
Place in performance rating
731
19.51
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
GP106
Code name
GK208
Workstation
Type
Laptop
6 February 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
27 January 2014 (7 years ago)
$585
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$1307 (2.2x MSRP)
Price now
$160
9.17
Value for money
0.37
GP106
GPU code name
GK208
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1024
Pipelines
384
1076 MHz
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
4,400 million
Transistor count
915 million
16 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
94.72
Texture fill rate
30.11
3,031 gflops
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1480 MHz
Boost clock speed
941 MHz
4,400 million
Number of transistors
915 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
33 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
201 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3
5 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
160 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
7008 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
140.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M, the size and number of monitors.

4x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
1.1.126
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 or NVIDIA GeForce 825M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P2000

30.1% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1024 vs 384)

Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (5 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (140.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Cheaper ($160 vs $1307 (2.2x MSRP))

Less power consumption (33 Watt vs 75 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro P2000 or NVIDIA GeForce 825M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 versus NVIDIA GeForce 825M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro P2000
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce 825M