NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K500M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro K500M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

520
Place in performance rating
861
4.51
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
GK107
Code name
GK107
Workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
1 March 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$234 (0.4x MSRP)
Price now
$19.95
1.22
Value for money
0.61
GK107
GPU code name
N14M-Q1
Workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro K500M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
192
954 MHz
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1,270 million
Transistor count
1,270 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
51 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
30.53
Texture fill rate
13.60
732.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
1,270 million
Number of transistors
1,270 million
51 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro K500M.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
202 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro K500M can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3 / GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
4000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
64 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro K500M, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro K500M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro K500M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro K500M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D or NVIDIA Quadro K500M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

5.41% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 192)

More memory bandwidth (64 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K500M

Cheaper ($19.95 vs $234 (0.4x MSRP))

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 51 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2000D or NVIDIA Quadro K500M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2000D .

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D versus NVIDIA Quadro K500M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K500M