Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
VS
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
VS
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L). Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

501
Place in performance rating
982
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Architecture
GCN 1.1
Kaby Lake GT3e
Code name
Beema/Mullins
Laptop
Type
Laptop
3 January 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
29 April 2014 (7 years ago)
$949
Price now
no data
1.25
Value for money
no data
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU code name
Beema/Mullins
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
128
300 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
600 MHz
189 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
55.20
Texture fill rate
no data
883 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
128
1100 MHz
Boost clock speed
600 MHz
189 million
Number of transistors
no data
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L).

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) can be seen in this section.

DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Memory type
no data
32 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L), the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

The difference between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L). Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0
4.6
OpenGL
no data
1.1.103
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 or AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

7.14% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 128)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 or AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 .

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 versus AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)