AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) and NVIDIA Quadro CX. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

982
Place in performance rating
668
no data
Value for money (0-100)
7.22
GCN 1.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Beema/Mullins
Code name
GT200B
Laptop
Type
Workstation
29 April 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
11 November 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,999
no data
Price now
$199 (0.1x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.46
Beema/Mullins
GPU code name
GT200B
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) and NVIDIA Quadro CX based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

128
Pipelines
192
300 MHz
Core clock speed
602 MHz
600 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
1,400 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
38.53
no data
Floating-point performance
462.3 gflops
128
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
600 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
no data
Number of transistors
1,400 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) and NVIDIA Quadro CX.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) and NVIDIA Quadro CX can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
no data
Memory bus width
384 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) and NVIDIA Quadro CX, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) and NVIDIA Quadro CX. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) and NVIDIA Quadro CX graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) or NVIDIA Quadro CX good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
NVIDIA Quadro CX
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 55 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro CX

3.39% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (192 vs 128)

So, AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) or NVIDIA Quadro CX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro CX .

AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) versus NVIDIA Quadro CX performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro CX