NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

1014
Place in performance rating
668
no data
Value for money (0-100)
7.22
GT2xx
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GT216
Code name
GT200B
Mobile workstation
Type
Workstation
7 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
11 November 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,999
$980
Price now
$199 (0.1x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.46
N10P-GLM
GPU code name
GT200B
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

48
Pipelines
192
550 MHz
Core clock speed
602 MHz
486 million
Transistor count
1,400 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
35 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
8.800
Texture fill rate
38.53
116.16 gflops
Floating-point performance
462.3 gflops
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
486 million
Number of transistors
1,400 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
150 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX can be seen in this section.

GDDR3, DDR3
Memory type
GDDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
790 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
25.28 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro CX graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M or NVIDIA Quadro CX good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 150 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro CX

3.36% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($199 (0.1x MSRP) vs $980)

More pipelines (192 vs 48)

More maximum RAM amount (1536 MB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s vs 25.28 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M or NVIDIA Quadro CX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro CX .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M versus NVIDIA Quadro CX performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro CX