Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
VS
AMD FireStream 9170
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
VS
AMD FireStream 9170

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FireStream 9170. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

581
Place in performance rating
786
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Architecture
TeraScale
Coffee Lake GT3e
Code name
RV670
Laptop
Type
Desktop
10 July 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
8 November 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Price now
$350
no data
Value for money
0.09
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU code name
RV670
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FireStream 9170 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
320
300 MHz
Core clock speed
800 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
666 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
105 Watt
50.40
Texture fill rate
12.80
no data
Floating-point performance
512.0 gflops
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
1150 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
no data
Number of transistors
666 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
105 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FireStream 9170.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FireStream 9170 can be seen in this section.

DDR3/DDR4
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FireStream 9170, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Technologies

The difference between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FireStream 9170 is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FireStream 9170. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1.103
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FireStream 9170 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 or AMD FireStream 9170 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
AMD FireStream 9170
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
AMD FireStream 9170
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
AMD FireStream 9170
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
AMD FireStream 9170
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
AMD FireStream 9170
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

3.14% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 320)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 105 Watt)

Advantages of AMD FireStream 9170

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 or AMD FireStream 9170?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 .

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 versus AMD FireStream 9170 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FireStream 9170