AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
581
0.08
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Cape Verde
Code name
Coffee Lake GT3e
Desktop
Type
Laptop
6 July 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
10 July 2019 (2 years ago)
$12.88
Price now
no data
Cape Verde
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

512
Pipelines
384
800 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1,500 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
55 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
25.60
Texture fill rate
50.40
819.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
1,500 million
Number of transistors
no data
55 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
4500 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
72 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 350 or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 350
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 350

More pipelines (512 vs 384)

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

6.12% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 55 Watt)

So, AMD Radeon R7 350 or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 .

AMD Radeon R7 350 versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 350
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645